Watch the demo · 2:36

See how Promptster actually works.

Two minutes of process telemetry: the prompts, tool calls, file diffs, and decision points captured from a real candidate session. The same evidence your reviewers will use.

Or scrub it yourself: open the interactive demo Explore the Teams demo
The apples-to-apples test

Same assessment. Same 12/12 green. Different engineer.

Nadia and Julian worked the identical date-parser task and both submitted with every visible test passing. An ATS scores them the same. The session telemetry doesn't.

Nadia Okafor strong hire
Visible tests
12/12 ✓
AI spend
$19.80
Avoidable spend
$1.10 (6%), one missed /clear
On a team / mo
≈ $22 wasted
Hidden verify suite
✓ passed
Julian Ferraro looks fine, isn't
Visible tests
12/12 ✓
AI spend
$48.60, 2.45× Nadia
Avoidable spend
$26.90 (55%), grind + re-pasted files
On a team / mo
≈ $541 wasted
Hidden verify suite
✗ failed

Now multiply the difference by every task, every engineer, every sprint. The way someone works with AI is a recurring line item, in API spend today, in the regressions that ship next quarter. The replay shows you which one you're hiring before you hire them.

On the record · signed · replayable

Read the process,
not just the commit.

Twelve founding teams will ship this with us. A technical screen that can't tell paste from craft isn't neutral. It's a ~$200K coin-flip you won't catch for months. If you hire 5+ engineers a year, we should talk.

Founding ratelocked through 20281 of 12 claimed
Book a 15-min intake See how it works